ComplianceIntermediate⏱ 12 min read📅 Updated 2026-01-15

Metro 2 Compliance Audit Checklist for 2026

A complete Metro 2® compliance audit checklist covering structural validation, FCRA field checks, logical consistency rules, and bureau-readiness requirements. CRRG® aligned.

#compliance audit#FCRA#CRRG#metro 2 validation#bureau submission

← All Topics|Compliance|4 more in this category

🏢

Hutchins Systems Editorial Team

38+ years of Metro 2® compliance expertise · Trusted by 1,200+ organizations

✓ Expert Reviewed

A Metro 2® compliance audit is a systematic review of your credit data file before it reaches the credit bureaus. It validates every segment, field, and logical relationship in your file against the Credit Reporting Resource Guide® (CRRG®) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Running a compliance audit before every submission is the single most effective way to prevent bureau rejections, consumer disputes, and FCRA liability.

🔑 Important

This checklist reflects the current CRRG® specification and 2026 FCRA enforcement priorities. The CRRG® is updated periodically — always verify your Metro 2 software is aligned with the latest edition.

Layer 1 — Structural & Format Validations

Question: Will the file pass bureau technical standards?

These checks verify that your Metro 2 file is correctly structured before any field-level content is evaluated. A file that fails structural validation is rejected immediately by the bureau's intake system — no human review occurs.

Layer 1 — Structural Checks

Header Segment format

All 18 required Header fields populated in correct format

Trailer Record

Present as last record; Record Count = Base Segments only (not Header or Trailer)

Record Descriptor Word

Correct value for each segment type

Field length & padding

Every field is exactly the specified length; short fields padded correctly

Numeric vs alpha enforcement

Numeric fields contain only digits; alpha fields contain no illegal characters

Required field presence

No required field is blank or zero-filled when a value is required

Segment sequencing

Base Segment → J1/J2 (if applicable) → K-Segments (if applicable), in correct order

Character set compliance

No non-ASCII characters, tabs, or line breaks within fields

Activity Date & Program Date format

Both in MMDDYYYY format (8 digits, no separators)

💡 Pro Tip

Purpose: Prevent file rejections by Equifax, Experian, TransUnion, and Innovis. A structural error means zero accounts are processed — not just the account with the error.

Layer 2 — Field-Level Logical Validations

Question: Do the fields make sense together?

These checks verify that the values in related fields are internally consistent. A file can pass structural validation and still contain logical errors that cause bureau edits, consumer disputes, or FCRA violations.

Layer 2 — Field Logic Checks

Account Status ↔ Payment Rating

Status 11 (Current) must have Payment Rating 0; Status 71–82 must have matching Payment Rating

Account Status ↔ Current Balance

Paid/Closed accounts (Status 13) must have $0 balance

Charge-Off Amount ↔ Account Status

Charge-Off Amount must be populated when Status = 97 (Charge-off)

Paid accounts reporting zero balance

Any account with Status 13 must report $0 Current Balance

Past Due Amount logic

Past Due Amount must be $0 when Account Status = 11 (Current)

Payment History Profile alignment

24-character history string must be consistent with current Account Status

Date Closed

Must be populated when Account Status = 13 (Paid/Closed); must not be populated for open accounts

Bankruptcy indicator consistency

Bankruptcy Special Comment Code must align with Account Status and Payment Rating

⚠️ Warning

The most common logical error is a mismatch between Account Status and Payment History Profile. For example, reporting Account Status 11 (Current) while the Payment History Profile shows recent late payments. This inconsistency triggers bureau edits and consumer disputes.

Layer 3 — Regulatory Risk Validations (FCRA)

Question: Does this data comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act?

These checks identify fields and patterns that create legal exposure under the FCRA. FCRA violations can result in regulatory action, class action lawsuits, and CFPB complaints.

Layer 3 — FCRA Regulatory Checks

Date of First Delinquency (DOFD)

Accurately reflects the date the account first became delinquent and was never brought current. Must never be reset or updated after initial reporting.

7-year obsolescence

Negative information must not be reported more than 7 years after the DOFD. Verify no account exceeds this limit.

Charge-off timing

Charge-off must be reported within 180 days of DOFD for open-end accounts.

Re-aging detection

DOFD must never be changed to extend the reporting period. Any change to DOFD after initial reporting is a red flag.

Dispute code reporting

Accounts under active dispute must be coded with the appropriate Consumer Information Indicator.

Settlement coding

Settled accounts must use the correct Special Comment Code (AU = Account in Dispute, etc.).

ECOA codes

Verify correct ECOA codes for all account holders. Invalid ECOA codes affect both parties' credit files.

SSN format

9 digits, no dashes or spaces. Incorrect SSN format causes identity matching failures.

Date of Birth

MMDDYYYY format. Used for identity verification — errors cause matching failures.

🔑 Important

Re-aging is one of the most serious FCRA violations. It occurs when a data furnisher resets the Date of First Delinquency to a later date, artificially extending how long negative information appears on a consumer's credit report. The CFPB actively pursues re-aging violations.

Layer 4 — Mapping & System-Level Validations

Question: Is your servicing system populating Metro 2® correctly?

These checks identify systemic errors — problems in how your loan origination system (LOS) or servicing system maps data to Metro 2® fields. A single mapping error can affect thousands of accounts simultaneously.

Layer 4 — System Mapping Checks

LOS/servicing to Metro 2® field mapping

Every source field in your system maps to the correct Metro 2® field

Automated rule testing

Conditional rules (e.g., "populate Charge-Off Amount when status = 97") fire correctly

Special Comment Code triggers

Correct codes populate automatically for bankruptcy, settlement, dispute, military service

Charge-off workflow

Charge-off status, amount, and date all populate correctly and simultaneously

Bankruptcy lifecycle coding

Account status and special comment codes update correctly through all stages of bankruptcy

Regression testing

After any system change, verify that Metro 2® output has not changed unexpectedly

💡 Pro Tip

Purpose: Surface-level file audits catch individual account errors. System-level audits catch the root cause — a mapping error that affects every account of a certain type. Always perform a system-level audit after any LOS or servicing system upgrade.

Layer 5 — Bureau-Readiness & Onboarding Support

For new data furnishers — smoothing the path to bureau acceptance.

New data furnishers face additional scrutiny from the bureaus on their first submissions. These checks are specifically relevant during the onboarding period.

Layer 5 — Bureau Readiness Checks

Test file validation

Test file passes all bureau technical edit checks before production submission

Pre-certification review

All required fields for bureau certification are populated correctly

Field usage compliance

No fields are populated that are not applicable to your account types

Edit rejection prevention

No accounts contain values that trigger known bureau edit codes

Top 6 FCRA Violations Found in Metro 2 Audits

Based on Hutchins Systems' 38+ years of compliance audit experience, these are the most frequently identified violations:

Inaccurate Date of First DelinquencyCritical

Misreporting the DOFD triggers premature or delayed 7-year obsolescence — a top FCRA violation risk. The DOFD must never be changed after initial reporting.

Re-Aging AccountsCritical

Resetting delinquency dates on past-due accounts extends negative reporting beyond the 7-year legal limit. Any change to DOFD after initial reporting is a CFPB enforcement priority.

Incorrect Account StatusHigh

Reporting active accounts as closed, or vice versa — creates Metro 2® logic errors and misleads credit bureaus on account standing. Also triggers consumer disputes.

Missing or Wrong ECOA CodesHigh

Accounts with co-signers require accurate ECOA coding. Errors affect both parties' credit files unfairly and can trigger disputes from consumers who were incorrectly coded.

Balance Reporting ErrorsMedium

Reporting outstanding balances after settlement, or failing to zero out paid accounts, contradicts Metro 2® logic rules and triggers consumer disputes about incorrect balances.

Reporting Deposits as DebtMedium

Security deposits are not delinquent debt and should not automatically be reported as charged-off debt. This is a common error for property managers and utility companies.

Pre-Submission Compliance Checklist

Run through this checklist before every monthly bureau submission:

[ ] Header: Activity Date in MMDDYYYY format
[ ] Header: Program Identifier matches bureau-issued code exactly
[ ] Header: Reporter Name matches data furnisher agreement exactly
[ ] Header: All 18 required fields populated
[ ] Base Segments: Account Status matches Payment History Profile
[ ] Base Segments: Paid/Closed accounts have $0 balance
[ ] Base Segments: DOFD is populated for all delinquent accounts and has not changed from prior month
[ ] Base Segments: No account exceeds 7-year reporting limit
[ ] Base Segments: ECOA codes are correct for all account holders
[ ] Base Segments: SSN is 9 digits with no dashes or spaces
[ ] J1/J2: Used correctly based on associated consumer's address
[ ] K1: Present for all collection and debt buyer accounts
[ ] Trailer: Record Count = number of Base Segments only
[ ] File has not been manually edited after generation
[ ] File passes your Metro 2® software's built-in validation

💡 Pro Tip

Hutchins Systems' Metro 2® software (Credit Time 2000©, e-CreditTime, and MORFi) performs all five layers of compliance validation automatically before generating your file. Our compliance audit service provides a detailed error report with field-level remediation guidance.

📂